By Dr. Chris Daft

What are MEMS?

“MEMS” is an acronym standing for Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems.  These are tiny mechanical devices which are made in integrated circuit (IC) factories.  When the technologies for electronic chips were developed, there was an unanticipated parallel benefit: the ability to precisely manufacture mechanical devices with very small features.

The celebrated physicist Richard Feynmann may have had the original idea. In his 1959 lecture entitled There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom, Feynmann asked, “What would happen if we could arrange the atoms one by one the way we want them?”

While it is still hard to make useful things on an atom-by-atom basis, MEMS at a somewhat larger scale has taken off commercially.

Commercial success of MEMS as described by a MEMS expert witness

Silicon, whose electronic versatility powered a revolution in electronics and computing, fortunately happens to also be an extremely good material for building micro-machines. Silicon supports highly repeatable motion and does not fatigue.  Silicon MEMS devices are made using the same lithographic printing techniques as ICs, and are easily connected to micro-circuitry.  Trillions of dollars have been invested in semiconductor manufacturing over the last 50 years.  MEMS products build on that giant accumulation of technological capability.

mems pic

Figure 1: Microscope image of part of a MEMS gyroscope.  The structure pictured is only about 0.5 mm wide.

Many MEMS devices behave as the “eyes and ears” of other systems. They are sensors of the environment.  They are found in a broad range of products today, for example:

  • Automobiles: MEMS devices control air-bags, sense tire pressures, enable dynamic stability control, yaw rate control and anti-lock brakes.
  • The best movie theaters create the image on the screen with an array of MEMS micro-mirrors.
  • A cell phone contains a large number of MEMS devices. Gyroscopes, accelerometers and magnetometers are all standard issue. The microphone is usually MEMS, and the loudspeaker and camera lens soon will be. Conflicting national regulations require a phone to transmit and receive signals in a dizzyingly diverse set of frequency bands. These are enabled by MEMS filters.

There were five companies with MEMS sales over $500 million in 2015, with the largest (Robert Bosch) having $1.2 billion in revenue. The total MEMS market size last year was $11.9 billion according to Yole, a market research firm.

MEMS Litigation

With significant dollar amounts at stake, litigation around MEMS intellectual property has proceeded briskly and has required the employment of MEMs expert witnesses. STMicroelectronics v. Invensense involved two of the largest players in an action concerning motion controllers found in video games, cameras, television remote controls, and the like.  Knowles, MEMSTech, Analog Devices (ADI), and Akustica (now owned by Bosch) had a dispute between 2006 and 2011 over MEMS microphone patents—see, for example, Knowles v. Analog Devices.  Due to the highly global nature of semiconductor manufacturing, a number of these are “337” actions at the United States International Trade Commission (ITC).

About the author

Dr. Chris Daft is an award winning, Oxford Educated scientist. He is an expert witness and consultant whose areas of expertise include MEMS, transducers and medical imaging. Dr. Daft has extensive Intellectual Property experience including patent development, analysis, licensing, and strategy.  He is a serial inventor who holds 22 U.S. Patents with more pending.  Dr. Daft holds a BA and MA in Physics from Oxford as well as Doctorate from Oxford in Materials Science.  The author may be contacted at:

chris.daft@riversonicsolutions.com
+1 (415) 800-3734   +1 (408) 806 7525
River Sonic Solutions LLC, 2443 Fillmore St. #380-4039, San Francisco, CA 94115.

References

STMicroelectronics, Inc., v. Invensense Inc., 3:12-cv-02475 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California, May 16, 2012).

Knowles Electronics, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., 1:09-cv-06238 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, October 06, 2009).